Australian Journal of
Taxonomy
Open-access, online, rapid taxonomy

This is a page from an unpublished manuscript
Please do not distribute it without express permission of the lead author
 

Stenobelus minutus Glatz, sp. nov.
{zoologyFigureCitations}
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:69541CF6-747B-4AD8-83E5-4154C194FD9E
{botanyFigureCitations}

Figure 1. Stenobelus minutus sp. nov., holotype, dorsal image. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 2. Stenobelus minutus, sp.nov. holotype, lateral image. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 3. Stenobelus minutus, sp.nov. holotype. Dorsal images of the foretarsus (left panel), mesotarsus (centre panel), and spination of the foreleg (right panel). Scale bars 0.25 mm.

Diagnosis

Stenobelus minutus can be differentiated from S. testaceus due to the latter having a long, acuminate, apical projection of each elytron, which extends beyond ventrite 5 by more than the length of the latter. Additionally, these projections have slight but obvious concave outer margins. By contrast, S. minutus (and S. tibialis) have elytra that lack apical projections and extend beyond ventrite 5 by less than its length, and the outer margin of the projections is straight to slightly convex (Fig. 1).

Stenobelus tibialis has an obvious unbroken vitta of white setae along the elytral suture and continuing on the pronotal midline (where it is unbroken), and its underside is clothed in dense white setae that often obscure the underlying cuticle. By contrast, the elytra of S. minutus lack a conspicuous white median vitta, being clothed only in sparse, almost evenly spread setae, the white median vitta on the pronotum is weak and medially interrupted, and the underside is only clothed in sparse setae that are rarely dense enough to obscure the cuticle. Care should be used when considering the pronotal vitta as this character may show intraspecific variation.

As its name suggests, S. minutus is much smaller than the other Stenobelus species, the holotype having a SL of only 4.1 mm, compared to the smallest of the Stenobelus specimens reported by Oberprieler et al. (2010) having a SL of > 7mm.

Description

Holotype (Figs. 1-3). SL 4.1 mm. Body generally dark brown with pronotum and head (but not antennae) darker. Antennae 11-segmented, filiform, with 3-segmented club, the last segment divided into two areas by a weak suture with distal area conical and distiguished by shorter, denser setae; basal segment wider than all subsequent ones except those of club; all segments with small number of white setae mainly in apical half and directed apicad; club segments also with smaller, recumbent, closely opposed setae primarily laterally & apically. Rostrum downcurved (Fig. 2), weakly rugose in basal half, glabrous distally of antennal insertions.


Elytral setae almost evenly spaced, contained in pits but not forming vittae; setae denser on scutellum, effectively forming basal extension of pronotal vitta. Pronotal midline with weak vitta of white setae interrupted in middle. Setae protruding somewhat from elytral edges in dorsal view, giving a weak fringe but denser near apex. Recumbent setae on pronotum, occipital region and base of rostrum, shorter than elsewhere, largely contained in pits. Setae denser on venter (particularly in lateral region of pronotum) but never completely obscuring cuticle beneath. Apical tergite and ventrite each with a fringe of gold-brown setae apically.


Profemora enlarged, with single large subapical tooth with weakly incurved tip on inner side (Fig. 3); other femora without subapical spines. Protibiae on inner side basally excavated into a single spine (as in S. testaceus), with a series of weaker spines along apical half; also with two apical spurs and preapical mucro; meso- and metatibiae with two apical spurs but lacking an obvious mucro. Basal tarsites expanded, most markedly on forelegs, there almost circular (Fig. 3). All tarsites with white setae dorsally (very sparse on tarsite 5), all except 5 covered with fine setae beneath; tarsite 3 strongly lobed; claws weakly divaricate and with a minute tooth about half way along the claw (Fig. 3, left panel).

Material examined

Holotype

Male (WAM-E122969), Western Australia, East Mount Barren, Fitzgerald River National Park, 33.927899°S 120.014831°E, 14 August 2016, D.A.Young. On Boronia albiflora.

Figure 1. Stenobelus minutus sp. nov., holotype, dorsal image. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 2. Stenobelus minutus, sp.nov. holotype, lateral image. Scale bar 1 mm.

Figure 3. Stenobelus minutus, sp.nov. holotype. Dorsal images of the foretarsus (left panel), mesotarsus (centre panel), and spination of the foreleg (right panel). Scale bars 0.25 mm.

Distribution & Habitat

The only known location is that of the holotype from the lower slopes of East Mount Barren in Fitzgerald River National Park, southern WA. The habitat consists of rocky areas with pockets of white, unconsolidated sand. The plant specis on which the specimen was caught is a southern WA endemic, Boronia albiflora R.Br. ex Benth., which was growing amongst low herbaceous flora with shrubby patches.

Etymology

The specific epithet minutus refers to the small size of this species relative to the other members of the genus, which are almost double the size of S. minutus.