This is a page from an unpublished manuscript
Please do not distribute it without express permission of the lead author
Aulacinus planiceps Szépligeti 1903: 390.—Kieffer 1904a: 6; Kieffer 1912: 350, 358; Hedicke 1939: 26.
Aulacus planiceps Szépligeti—Smith 2001: 274, comb. nov.; Jennings 2010 [on-line checklist]; Turrisi 2017: 933; Jennings et al. 2018: 74.
Aulacus hackeri Jennings & Austin, 2018: 48.—ABRS 2019 [on-line checklist]. syn. nov.
Figure 69. Aulacus planiceps (Szépligeti), female, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 1.00 mm.
Figure 70. Aulacus planiceps (Szépligeti), A, lateral head; B, frontal face; C, dorsal head; D, lateral mesosoma; E, dorsal mesosoma; F, ovipositor guide; G, fore wing. Scale bar = 1.00 mm.
Diagnostic description.
Female. Body size (10.0–11.5) mm, ovipositor length (15.0–16.0) mm, fore wing length (8.3–8.7) mm (Fig. 69); colouration black, fore and mid legs excluding coxa orange, tarsomeres cream-coloured, hind tasomere cream-coloured execpt basal two-thirds of tarsomere one and tarsomere five an dclaw dark brown, ovipositor sheath dark brown; wings hyaline except for indistinct brown infuscation at apex 1st marginal and 4th submarginal cell (Fig. 70G), hind wing veins spectral; head shape quadrate, width (1.1–1.5) × length, postocular space (0.5) × eye length in dorsal view (Fig. 70C), raised transverse carina above toruli absent, malar space (0.2) × height of eye (Fig. 70A); length of scape (1.5–1.8) × length of pedicel, 1st flagellomere (1.3–1.5) × length of scape, (0.5–0.7) × 2nd flagellomere; mesosoma length (1.7–1.8) × height; mesoscutum in lateral view rounded antero-dorsally (Fig. 70D); mesoscutum length (0.9–1.1) × width in dorsal view (Fig. 70E); medial lobe coarse transverse carinae; ovipositor guide transverse, positioned medial (Fig. 70F); ovipositor sheath length (1.7–1.8) × fore wing length (Fig. 69); 2-Rs+M (0.5–0.6) × 1-Rs+M, three hamuli, basal hamulus separated from other two (Fig. 70G); metasoma clavate, T1+T2 length (3.4) × width in dorsal view.
Abacus planiceps is similar to A. albimanus but can be separated based on black metafemur colouration (reddish-brown in A. albimanus), dark brown ovipositor sheath (large cream-coloured band sub-apically in A. albimanus), coarser transverse striations on mesoscutum (finer striations in A. albimanus).
Material examined.
Holotype. The whereabouts of the holotype female in the HNHM is unknown. The type locality is given as NSW (Szépligeti 1903).
Other material examined.
AUSTRALIA – Queensland • 1 ♀, Holotype of Aulacus hackeri, “Tamborine Mountain, H. Hacker, 27.10.[19]12” (QM) • 11 ♀♀, Paratypes of Aulacus hackeri, Tamborine Mountain, H. Hacker leg., 27.10.1912 (QM) • 4 ♀♀, National Park, XI.1920 H. Hacker leg. (QM) • 1 ♀, Tamborine Mountains, 27.Oct.1913, H Hacker leg. (QM). – NSW • 1 ♀, Mount Tomah, Blue Mountains, 3.Nov.1992, N.W. Rodd leg. (AM:K243334).
Figure 69. Aulacus planiceps (Szépligeti), female, lateral habitus. Scale bar = 1.00 mm.
Figure 70. Aulacus planiceps (Szépligeti), A, lateral head; B, frontal face; C, dorsal head; D, lateral mesosoma; E, dorsal mesosoma; F, ovipositor guide; G, fore wing. Scale bar = 1.00 mm.
Distribution.
This species is known from two locations, the Tamborine Mountains, Queensland and in NSW (Fig. 97).
Biology.
Unknown.
Notes.
The specimen examined in Jennings et al. 2018 that matched the brief description of Szépligeti (1903) is conspecific with the type specimens of A. hackeri. These specimens were compared with the original description and Kieffer’s (1911) redescription. Given the similarity between the species we synonymise A. hackeri with A. planiceps.